Proposed Convention Overture By Kurt Marquart

By: Rev. Jack Cascione

PROPOSED RESOLUTION NOT TO LET STATUS AND PRIVILEGE OVERRIDE TRUTH IN THE CHURCH

Whereas, the Commission on Constitutional Matters (CCM) has ruled that the "Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod do not allow or contemplate the expulsion of a member of the Synod on the basis of an action taken with the full knowledge and approval of the appropriate ecclesiastical supervisor" (02-2296, Reporter, March 2003, p. 10); and

Whereas, this ruling flatly contradicts Holy Scripture, which repeatedly warns against "respect[ing] persons in judgment" (Deut 1:17; see also Eph. 6:9, Col. 3:25, James 2:1,9), "making the word of God of none effect through [human] tradition" (St. Mk. 7:13), or "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" (St. Mk. 7:7), and insists that "we must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29); and

Whereas, the CCM ruling is incompatible with the Lutheran Confession, which

 -- teach that "it is not lawful for a human being to repeal an obligation that is plainly a matter of divine right" (Augsburg Confession XXVII, 24; Kolb-Wengert, p. 85);

 -- make the "marks" of the church all-decisive, namely "the pure teaching of the gospel and the administration of the sacraments in harmony with the gospel of Christ"--not the whim or discretion of "supreme external monarchy" of ecclesiastical supervisors (Apology VII/VIII, 3; p. 174-184);

 -- warn against those who "demand that their traditions be observed more carefully than the gospel" (Apology XXVIII, 3; p. 289);

 -- deny that texts like St. Lk. 10:16 and Heb. 13:17 grant ecclesiastical supervisors any authority beyond the Gospel itself (Apology XXVIII, 17-21, pp. 291-292);

 -- reject as "also purely religious raving [enthusiasm]" the claims of the chief of all ecclesiastical supervisors, "in that the pope boasts that 'all laws are in the shrine of his heart' and that what he decides and commands in his churches is supposed to be Spirit and law—even when it is above or contrary to the Scriptures of the spoken Word. This is all the old devil and old snake, who also turned Adam and Eve into enthusiasts and led them from the external Word of God to 'spirituality' and their own presumption . . . It is the source, power, and might of all the heresies, even that of the papacy and Mohammed" (Smalcald Articles  III/8/4,5, 9; pp.322, 323);

 -- treat as a "mark of the Antichrist" the fact that a notorious ecclesiastical supervisor "is not willing to be judged by the church or by anyone else and places his authority above the judgment of councils and of the whole church. To refuse to be judged by the church or by anyone is to make himself God." Further: [Forbidding judicial inquiry] "does more harm than any cruel act. For when the church has been deprived of valid judicial process, it is not possible to remove ungodly teachings and impious forms of worship, and they destroy countless souls generation upon generation . . . Since, however, judgments of the councils are judgments of the church, not of the pontiffs, it is wholly appropriate that rulers restrain the wantonness of the pontiffs and ensure that the power to examine and to make judgments according to the Word of God is not snatched away from the church" (Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope, 40, 51, 56; pp. 337, 339);

 -- recognize no privileged "official" zone of immunity from the normal demands of truth; quite on the contrary: "We also believe, teach, and confess that in a time when confession is necessary, as when the enemies of God's Word want to suppress the pure teaching of the holy gospel, the entire community of God, indeed, every Christian, especially servants of the Word as the leaders of the community of God, are obligated according to God's Word to confess true teaching and everything that pertains to the whole of religion freely and publicly. They are to do so not only with words but also in actions and deeds" (Formula of Concord, S.D., X, 10; p. 637); and

Whereas, the CCM ruling makes a mockery of the Synodical constitution by, in effect, amending Article VI, Condition of Membership, as follows:

 "2. Renunciation of unionism and syncretism of every description, such as: a. Serving congregations of mixed confession, as such, by ministers of the Church--UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE APPROPRIATE ECCLESIASTICAL SUPERVISOR;

b. Taking part in the services and sacramental rites of heterodox congregations or of congregations of mixed confession—UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE APPROPRIATE ECCLESIASTICAL SUPERVISOR;

c. Participating in heterodox tract and missionary activities-- UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE APPROPRIATE ECCLESIASTICAL SUPERVISOR; etc." and

Whereas, since "Christians can be ruled by no other means than by God's Word alone" (Luther, cited in C.F.W. Walther, Church and Ministry, p. 316), the Missouri Synod was intended to rely on God's Word alone, not on human authority and regulations:

Also our synodical body has the same prospects of salutary influence if it does not attempt to operate through any other means than through the power of the Word of God. Even then we must expect battles, but they will not be the mean, depressing battles for obedience to human laws, but the holy battles for God's Word, for God's honor and kingdom . . . [Otherwise] our chief battle would soon center about the execution of manufactured, external human ordinances and institutions and would swallow up the true blessed battle for the real treasure of the church, for the purity and unity of doctrine (C.F.W. Walther, First Presidential Address, Concordia Journal, vol. 2, no. 5 [Sept. 1976] p.202);

All government of the Church which does not bind the consciences of Christians to Christ's Word, but to the word of men, is pseudo-government (Pieper, Dogmatics II:394);

Resolved that the LC-MS in convention assembled in 2004 rejects and overturns the CCM ruling in question, and declares it null and void and of no further effect.

May 13, 2003